ABSTRACT
Background: Following reduction of public health and social measures concurrent with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron emergence in late 2021 in Australia, COVID-19 case notification rates rose rapidly. As rates of direct viral testing and reporting dropped, true infection rates were most likely to be underestimated. Objective: To better understand infection rates and immunity in this population, we aimed to estimate SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in Australians aged 0-19 years. Methods: We conducted a national cross sectional serosurvey from June 1, 2022, to August 31, 2022, in children aged 0-19 years undergoing an anesthetic procedure at eight tertiary pediatric hospitals. Participant questionnaires were administered, and blood samples tested using the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 total spike and nucleocapsid antibody assays. S and N seroprevalence adjusted for geographic and socioeconomic imbalances in the participant sample compared to the Australian population was estimated using multilevel regression and poststratification within a Bayesian framework. Results: Blood was collected from 2,046 participants (median age: 6.6 years). Adjusted seroprevalence of spike-antibody was 92.1 % (95% credible interval (CrI) 91.0-93.3%) and nucleocapsid-antibody was 67.0% (95% CrI 64.6-69.3). In unvaccinated children spike and nucleocapsid antibody seroprevalences were 84.2% (95% CrI 81.9-86.5) and 67.1% (95%CrI 64.0-69.8), respectively. Seroprevalence increased with age but was similar across geographic distribution and socioeconomic quintiles. Conclusion: Most Australian children and adolescents aged 0-19 years, across all jurisdictions were infected with SARS-CoV-2 by August 2022, suggesting rapid and uniform spread across the population in a very short time period. High seropositivity in unvaccinated children informed COVID-19 vaccine recommendations in Australia. Funding: Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Rapidly identifying and isolating people with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection has been a core strategy to contain COVID-19 in Australia, but a proportion of infections go undetected. We estimated SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody prevalence (seroprevalence) among blood donors in metropolitan Melbourne following a COVID-19 outbreak in the city between June and September 2020. The aim was to determine the extent of infection spread and whether seroprevalence varied demographically in proportion to reported cases of infection. The design involved stratified sampling of residual specimens from blood donors (aged 20-69 years) in three postcode groups defined by low (<3 cases/1,000 population), medium (3{-}{-}-7 cases/1,000 population) and high (>7 cases/1,000 population) COVID-19 incidence based on case notification data. All specimens were tested using the Wantai SARS-CoV-2 total antibody assay. Seroprevalence was estimated with adjustment for test sensitivity and specificity for the Melbourne metropolitan blood donor and residential populations, using multilevel regression and poststratification. Overall, 4,799 specimens were collected between 23 November and 17 December 2020. Seroprevalence for blood donors was 0.87% (90% credible interval: 0.25-1.49%). The highest estimates, of 1.13% (0.25-2.15%) and 1.11% (0.28-1.95%), respectively, were observed among donors living in the lowest socioeconomic areas (Quintiles 1 and 2) and lowest at 0.69% (0.14-1.39%) among donors living in the highest socioeconomic areas (Quintile 5). When extrapolated to the Melbourne residential population, overall seroprevalence was 0.90% (0.26-1.51%), with estimates by demography groups similar to those for the blood donors. The results suggest a lack of extensive community transmission and good COVID-19 case ascertainment based on routine testing during Victorias second epidemic wave. Residual blood donor samples provide a practical epidemiological tool for estimating seroprevalence and information on population patterns of infection, against which the effectiveness of ongoing responses to the pandemic can be assessed.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Importance The immune response in children with SARS-CoV-2 infection is not well understood. Objective To compare seroconversion in children and adults with non-hospitalized (mild) SARS-CoV-2 infection and to understand the factors that influence this. Design Participants were part of a household cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Weekly nasopharyngeal/throat swabs and blood samples were collected during the acute and convalescent period following PCR diagnosis for analysis. Setting Participants were recruited at the Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia between May and October 2020. Participants Those who had a SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive nasal/throat swab. Main outcomes and measures SARS-CoV-2 antibody and cellular responses in children and adults. Seroconversion was defined by seropositivity in all three serological assays. Results Among 108 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive participants, 57 were children (median age: 4, IQR 2-10) and 51 were adults (median age: 37, IQR 34-45). Using three established serological assays, a lower proportion of children seroconverted compared with adults [20/54 (37.0%) vs 32/42 (76.2%); (p<0.001)]. This was not related to viral load, which was similar in children and adults [mean Ct 28.58 (SD: 6.83) vs 24.14 (SD: 8.47)]. Age and sex also did not influence seroconversion or the magnitude of antibody response within children or adults. Notably, in adults (but not children) symptomatic adults had three-fold higher antibody levels than asymptomatic adults (median 227.5 IU/mL, IQR 133.7-521.6 vs median 75.3 IU/mL, IQR 36.9-113.6). Evidence of cellular immunity was observed in adults who seroconverted but not in children who seroconverted. Conclusion and Relevance In this non-hospitalized cohort with mild COVID-19, children were less likely to seroconvert than adults despite similar viral loads. This has implications for future protection following COVID-19 infection in children and for interpretation of serosurveys that involve children. Further research to understand why children are less likely to seroconvert and develop symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection, and comparison with vaccine responses may be of clinical and scientific importance. Key points Question What proportion of children with non-hospitalized (mild) SARS-CoV-2 infection seroconvert compared to adults? Findings In this cohort study conducted in 2020, we found the proportion of children who seroconverted to SARS-CoV-2 was half that in adults despite similar viral load. Meaning Serology is a less reliable marker of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. SARS-CoV-2-infected children who do not seroconvert may be susceptible to reinfection. Our findings support strategies to protect children against COVID-19 including vaccination.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Although pregnancy poses a greater risk for severe COVID-19, the underlying immunological changes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy are poorly understood. We defined immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant and non-pregnant women during acute and convalescent COVID-19 up to 258 days post symptom onset, quantifying 217 immunological parameters. Additionally, matched maternal and cord blood were collected from COVID-19 convalescent pregnancies. Although serological responses to SARS-CoV-2 were similar in pregnant and non-pregnant women, cellular immune analyses revealed marked differences in key NK cell and unconventional T cell responses during COVID-19 in pregnant women. While NK, γδ T cells and MAIT cells displayed pre-activated phenotypes in healthy pregnant women when compared to non-pregnant age-matched women, activation profiles of these pre-activated NK and unconventional T cells remained unchanged at acute and convalescent COVID-19 in pregnancy. Conversely, activation dynamics of NK and unconventional T cells were prototypical in non-pregnant women in COVID-19. In contrast, activation of αβ CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, T follicular helper cells and antibody-secreting cells was similar in pregnant and non-pregnant women with COVID-19. Elevated levels of IL-1β, IFN-γ, IL-8, IL-18 and IL-33 were also found in pregnant women in their healthy state, and these cytokine levels remained elevated during acute and convalescent COVID-19. Collectively, our study provides the first comprehensive map of longitudinal immunological responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women, providing insights into patient management and education during COVID-19 pregnancy.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Although the respiratory tract is the primary site of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the ensuing immunopathology, respiratory immune responses are understudied and urgently needed to understand mechanisms underlying COVID-19 disease pathogenesis. We collected paired longitudinal blood and respiratory tract samples (endotracheal aspirate, sputum or pleural fluid) from hospitalized COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 controls. Cellular, humoral and cytokine responses were analysed and correlated with clinical data. SARS-CoV-2-specific IgM, IgG and IgA antibodies were detected using ELISA and multiplex assay in both the respiratory tract and blood of COVID-19 patients, although a higher receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific IgM and IgG seroconversion level was found in respiratory specimens. SARS-CoV-2 neutralization activity in respiratory samples was detected only when high levels of RBD-specific antibodies were present. Strikingly, cytokine/chemokine levels and profiles greatly differed between respiratory samples and plasma, indicating that inflammation needs to be assessed in respiratory specimens for the accurate assessment of SARS-CoV-2 immunopathology. Diverse immune cell subsets were detected in respiratory samples, albeit dominated by neutrophils. Importantly, we also showed that dexamethasone and/or remdesivir treatment did not affect humoral responses in blood of COVID-19 patients. Overall, our study unveils stark differences in innate and adaptive immune responses between respiratory samples and blood and provides important insights into effect of drug therapy on immune responses in COVID-19 patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Although pregnancy poses a greater risk for severe COVID-19, the underlying immunological changes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy are poorly understood. We defined immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant and non-pregnant women during acute and convalescent COVID-19 up to 258 days post symptom onset, quantifying 217 immunological parameters. Additionally, matched maternal and cord blood were collected from COVID-19 convalescent pregnancies. Although serological responses to SARS-CoV-2 were similar in pregnant and non-pregnant women, cellular immune analyses revealed marked differences in key NK cell and unconventional T cell responses during COVID-19 in pregnant women. While NK cells, {gamma}{delta} T cells and MAIT cells displayed pre-activated phenotypes in healthy pregnant women when compared to non-pregnant age-matched women, activation profiles of these pre-activated NK and unconventional T cells remained unchanged at acute and convalescent COVID-19 in pregnancy. Conversely, activation dynamics of NK and unconventional T cells were prototypical in non-pregnant women in COVID-19. In contrast, activation of {beta} CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, T follicular helper cells and antibody-secreting cells was similar in pregnant and non-pregnant women with COVID-19. Elevated levels of IL-1{beta}, IFN-{gamma}, IL-8, IL-18 and IL-33 were also found in pregnant women in their healthy state, and these cytokine levels remained elevated during acute and convalescent COVID-19. Collectively, our study provides the first comprehensive map of longitudinal immunological responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women, providing insights into patient management and education during COVID-19 pregnancy.
Subject(s)
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , COVID-19ABSTRACT
Background: We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted subunit vaccine for COVID-19 based on recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein stabilised in a prefusion conformation by a novel molecular clamp (Sclamp).Methods: Phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in Australia (July 2020–ongoing; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04495933). Healthy adults (18-55 years) received two doses of placebo, 5-μg, 15-μg, or 45-μg SARS-CoV-2 Sclamp, or one 45-μg dose of SARS-CoV-2 Sclamp followed by placebo, 28 days apart (n=120; 24 per group). Safety, humoral immunogenicity (ELISA, microneutralisation, pseudovirus neutralisation), and cellular immunogenicity (antigen-specific CD4+/CD8+ T-cells, antibody-secreting cells) were assessed up to 56 days after the first dose.Findings: The SARS-CoV-2 Sclamp vaccine was very well tolerated with few systemic reactions. All two-dose regimens elicited robust, broadly neutralising humoral responses. Geometric mean titres were higher than in sera from convalescent COVID-19 patients and strongly neutralised spike variants of concern, including N501Y. Moreover, humoral and cellular responses were highly correlated. However, antibodies elicited to a peptide sequence used in the molecular clamp derived from human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) gp41 cross-reacted weakly with some HIV diagnostic screening tests.Interpretation: These first-in-human results demonstrate that a subunit vaccine comprising mammalian cell culture-derived, molecular clamp-stabilised recombinant spike protein formulated in a squalene-in-oil adjuvant elicits strong immune responses with an excellent safety profile. However, the gp41 peptide induced diagnostic interference, creates a likely barrier to widespread use and highlights the criticality of potential off-target immunogenicity during vaccine development. Studies are ongoing with alternative molecular clamp trimerisation domains to ameliorate this response.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04495933).Funding: Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations; National Health and Medical Research Council, Queensland Government, and philanthropic sources.Declaration of Interests: KJC and DW report grants from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, and the Queensland Government, during the conduct of the study; other from ViceBio Limited, outside the submitted work; and has patents pending (AU 2018241252; BR112019019813.0; CA 3057171; CH 201880022016.9; EP 18775234.0; IN 201917038666; ID P00201909145; IL 269534; JP 2019-553883; MX/a/2019/011599; NZ 757178; KR 0-2019-7031415; SG 11201908280S; US 16/498865). JB reports personal fees from CSL Limited, during the conduct of the study, and other from CSL Limited, outside the submitted work. WZ reports grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China, and the Jack Ma Foundation, during the conduct of the study. SM-H reports grants from Canarian Foundation Doctor Manuel Morales, during the conduct of the study. KJS reports grants from the the Australian Medical Research Future Fund, during the conduct of the study. AWC reports grants from the Australian Medical Research Future Fund and a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Career Development Fellowship, during the conduct of the study. BDW reports grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, the Australian Medical Research Future Fund, and the Victorian State Government, during the conduct of the study. PMH reports grants from the Australian Medical Research Future Fund, during the conduct of the study. DP reports grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, the A2 Milk Foundation, and the Jack Ma Foundation, during the conduct of the study. CR reports grants from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, during the conduct of the study. PRY reports grants from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, and the Queensland Government, during the conduct of the study; grants from ViceBio Limited, outside the submitted work; and a patent issued (US 2020/0040042). FLM, Zl, DKW, PE, JAL, STMC, NM, SA, CLH, KH, PG, LH, THON, MHT, PT, JB, PCR, SN, SC, TH, KK, KS, and TPM have nothing to disclose.Ethics Approval Statement: The protocol was approved by the Alfred Health Human Research Ethics Committee (2020001376/334/20).
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , COVID-19 , Alopecia AreataABSTRACT
Background: Robust serological assays are essential for long-term control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Many recently released point-of-care (PoCT) serological assays have been distributed with little pre-market validation. Methods: Performance characteristics for five PoCT lateral flow devices approved for use in Australia were compared to a commercial enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) and a recently described novel surrogate virus neutralisation test (sVNT). Results: Sensitivities for PoCT ranged from 51.8% (95% CI 43.1 to 60.4%) to 67.9% (95% CI 59.4-75.6%), and specificities from 95.6% (95% CI 89.2-98.8%) to 100.0% (95% CI 96.1-100.0%). Overall ELISA sensitivity for either IgA or IgG detection was 67.9% (95% CI 59.4-75.6), increasing to 93.8% (95% CI 85.0-98.3%) for samples >14 days post symptom onset. Overall, sVNT sensitivity was 60.9% (95% CI 53.2-68.4%), rising to 91.2%% (95% CI 81.8-96.7%) for samples collected >14 days post-symptom onset, with a specificity 94.4% (95% CI 89.2-97.5%), Conclusion: Performance characteristics for COVID-19 serological assays were generally lower than those reported by manufacturers. Timing of specimen collection relative to onset of illness or infection is crucial in the reporting of performance characteristics for COVID-19 serological assays. The optimal algorithm for implementing serological testing for COVID-19 remains to be determined, particularly in low-prevalence settings.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , InfectionsABSTRACT
We report the kinetics of the immune response in relation to clinical and virological features of a patient with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) requiring hospitalisation. Increased antibody-secreting cells, follicular T-helper cells, activated CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells and IgM/IgG SARS-CoV-2-binding antibodies were detected in blood, prior to symptomatic recovery. These immunological changes persisted for at least 7 days following full resolution of symptoms, indicating substantial anti-viral immunity in this non-severe COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
We report the kinetics of the immune response in relation to clinical and virological features of a patient with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) requiring hospitalisation. Increased antibody-secreting cells, follicular T-helper cells, activated CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells and IgM/IgG SARS-CoV-2-binding antibodies were detected in blood, prior to symptomatic recovery. These immunological changes persisted for at least 7 days following full resolution of symptoms, indicating substantial anti-viral immunity in this non-severe COVID-19.Authors Irani Thevarajan and Thi HO Nguyen contributed equally to this work.